When it comes to solving software problems (or any kind of problem, for that matter), the hardest challenge can often be our perception of the size or complexity of the solution we need to implement. Although some obstacles demand truly sophisticated solutions, this frame of mind can generate unnecessary inertia and prevent leaders from acting.
If this situation sounds familiar to you and you want to take a different approach for your next product, then it may be time to consider microservices as an alternative to the traditional monolithic model.
In the classic software development paradigm, products are designed and built almost like skyscrapers. Their foundational infrastructure needs to be firm and immovable because each subsequent level (or feature) will be strictly dependent upon its predecessors. This requires equal measures of foresight and good guessing because it represents a commitment to an architecture or technology stack that can come to feel rigid.
In microservices, on the other hand, products are designed like custom homes, with each feature (or “service”) being developed independently from its counterparts by specialists and then loosely coupled with others to create a cohesive whole. These services are typically created and maintained by small teams and can leverage completely different technologies.
The defining feature of a microservice architecture is the agility through which it unifies many discreet software components to address a larger need. The smaller features it unifies address specific, narrow needs that are factors in an overall business outcome.
For instance, in a web application for project management, some examples of separate services might be user account management, workflow catalog management and customer support management. Any of these services could be built individually with an appropriate technology stack and then subsequently unified via APIs on the back end and a single web layer on the front end. This combination of disparate parts is the essence of microservices.
While the monolithic model has its advantages, microservices offer at least the following benefits:
Software architecture is an early stage consideration for any product, so it is important to identify the correct option for the products you hope to deliver—and to do it well in advance of beginning development. However, as you consider launching something new or expanding your existing offering, these advantages can guide your decision.
Once you have decided to pursue a microservice architecture, it is crucial to spend adequate time assessing your business objectives and mapping out your plan for achieving them. These are the basic steps we recommend you follow:
Completing this exercise will help you establish a reasonable baseline to which your development teams can align their efforts. If you encounter any challenges during this process or would like additional input from an expert, our seasoned consultants are always available to assist you. We have helped many clients successfully implement microservices to solve problems like those your business no doubt faces today.
Contact Us Today
Big data is renowned for its ability to transform, refocus, and even create new business where none existed before. Its advantages and potential are widely recognized across multiple industries. The drawbacks and disadvantages of big data in modern business are typically well understood too. Time, costs, and the bandwidth requirements of cloud computing can keep many companies from using data analysis to its greatest potential.Explore
Businesses across a range of industries choose to collect data on their customers as a way to provide them better and more useful services. Whether you’re a technology company, a medical company or even a government body, this personalized data can be incredibly useful for creating meaningful and targeted experiences for your users or customers.Explore
Nearly everyone in business is familiar with the Pareto principle—sometimes called the “80/20 rule”—which describes an oft-observed phenomenon in which only 20% of the inputs of a process or program generates 80% of the outputs. This translates, for example, into only 20% of clients generating 80% of a company’s revenue or only 20% of a workforce creating 80% of a company’s value. It is an important concept for executives to keep in mind while prioritizing initiatives for customer retention and business development.Explore