When it comes to solving software problems (or any kind of problem, for that matter), the hardest challenge can often be our perception of the size or complexity of the solution we need to implement. Although some obstacles demand truly sophisticated solutions, this frame of mind can generate unnecessary inertia and prevent leaders from acting.
If this situation sounds familiar to you and you want to take a different approach for your next product, then it may be time to consider microservices as an alternative to the traditional monolithic model.
In the classic software development paradigm, products are designed and built almost like skyscrapers. Their foundational infrastructure needs to be firm and immovable because each subsequent level (or feature) will be strictly dependent upon its predecessors. This requires equal measures of foresight and good guessing because it represents a commitment to an architecture or technology stack that can come to feel rigid.
In microservices, on the other hand, products are designed like custom homes, with each feature (or “service”) being developed independently from its counterparts by specialists and then loosely coupled with others to create a cohesive whole. These services are typically created and maintained by small teams and can leverage completely different technologies.
The defining feature of a microservice architecture is the agility through which it unifies many discreet software components to address a larger need. The smaller features it unifies address specific, narrow needs that are factors in an overall business outcome.
For instance, in a web application for project management, some examples of separate services might be user account management, workflow catalog management and customer support management. Any of these services could be built individually with an appropriate technology stack and then subsequently unified via APIs on the back end and a single web layer on the front end. This combination of disparate parts is the essence of microservices.
While the monolithic model has its advantages, microservices offer at least the following benefits:
Software architecture is an early stage consideration for any product, so it is important to identify the correct option for the products you hope to deliver—and to do it well in advance of beginning development. However, as you consider launching something new or expanding your existing offering, these advantages can guide your decision.
Once you have decided to pursue a microservice architecture, it is crucial to spend adequate time assessing your business objectives and mapping out your plan for achieving them. These are the basic steps we recommend you follow:
Completing this exercise will help you establish a reasonable baseline to which your development teams can align their efforts. If you encounter any challenges during this process or would like additional input from an expert, our seasoned consultants are always available to assist you. We have helped many clients successfully implement microservices to solve problems like those your business no doubt faces today.
Contact Us Today
Connecting more people to data has become imperative for organizations worldwide. In Top Trends in Data & Analytics for 2022, Gartner stated, “Connections between diverse and distributed data and people create truly impactful insight and innovation. These connections are critical to assisting humans and machines in making quicker, more accurate, trustworthy, and contextualized decisions while considering an increasing number of factors, stakeholders, and data sources.”Explore
Since the dawn of business, users have looked for three main components when it comes to data: Search | Secure| Share. Now let's talk about the evolution of data over the years. It's a story in itself if one pays attention. Back then, applications were created to handle a set of processes/tasks. These processes/tasks, when grouped logically, became a sub-function, a set of sub-functions constituted a function, and a set of functions made up an enterprise. Phase 1 – Data-AwareExplore
Practitioners in the data realm have gone through various acronyms over the years. It all started with "Decision Support Systems" followed by "Data Warehouse", "Data Marts", "Data Lakes", "Data Fabric", and "Data Mesh", amongst storage formats of RDBMS, MPP, Big Data, Blob, Parquet, Iceberg, etc., and data collection, consolidation, and consumption patterns that have evolved with technology.Explore
Enterprises have, over time, invested in a variety of tools, technologies, and methodologies to solve the critical problem of managing enterprise data assets, be it data catalogs, security policies associated with data access, or encryption/decryption of data (in motion and at rest) or identification of PII, PHI, PCI data. As technology has evolved, so have the tools and methodologies to implement the same. However, the issue continues to persist. There are a variety of reasons for the same:Explore
Finding Hidden Patterns and Correlations Innovative technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) are transforming the way we approach data analytics. AI, ML and NLP are categorized under the umbrella term of “cognitive analytics,” which is an approach that leverages human-like computer intelligence to identify hidden patterns and correlations in data.Explore
What Is an SQL Query Engine? SQL query engine architecture was designed to allow users to query a variety of data sources within a single query. While early SQL-based query engines such as Apache Hive allowed analysts to cut through the clutter of analytical data, they found running SQL analytics on multi-petabyte data warehouses to be a time-intensive process that was difficult to visualize and hard to scale.Explore